After-Action Reports
April 21st, 2025
Jason Weisberger, NT0Y
jason@weisb.net
RE: MI QSO Party 2025
The inaugural MIQP following station renovations (or at least the majority of them) was extremely successful. Brennan KE8JVZ and Jay NT0Y started off the event, first by setting up a third station with an FT-710 and then by setting up a 40 meter doublet on the roof of the Engineering Building. With approximately 50 feet of ladder line into an extension-cord powered MFJ 939-Y tuner, the doublet proved highly successful on it's primary band of operation. Jay operated 40 meters, while Brennan called CQ on 20 with the brand new and as-of-then unproven Momobeam Penta 10. It wasted no time in making it's presence known on all sides of the country, plus some rare DX and Hawaii. Signal reports from the beam were a true 59+ for a vast majority of the contest, even on low power.
Soon after the start of the contest, Charlie KE8ZRH joined and operated the 40 meter station. While 20 was more or less sparse, but very responsive due to our antenna, 40 meters was wall-to-wall. Managing pile-ups was a required skill. Frank NF8M arrived soon after Charlie and offered a very nice chunk of 2-pointed CW QSOs. As the only CW operator in the contest that night, he offered a priceless amount of additional multipliers and raw points.
As the sun began to set, Frank turned the station over to Charlie and Brennan, who set out on 20 meters to collect as many states and provinces on voice as possible. Charlie also invited his unlicensed roommate and friend over to handle the station for about an hour. Meanwhile Jay operated the third station on an off-center-fed dipole, attempting to collect some 80 meter Qs. This turned out to be extremely difficult due to an S9+ noise floor and lots of interference with the 40 meter station. The two stations needed to be operated in sync, only calling when the other station did so that the receive didn't conduct any QRM.
We ended the contest with a score which proved to be higher than any submitted for the club in recent recorded history (back through 2008). We've resolved many of the antenna and feedline issues in the station which bolstered the score. Target of opportunity for next year will be our noise level on 80 meters, possibly deploying a loop-on-ground or beverage antenna.
Go Green!
Jason Weisberger, NT0Y
jason@weisb.net
msuamateurradioclub@gmail.com
https://msuarc.egr.msu.edu/
W8SH Breakdown:
BAND CW PHONE
80 0 20
40 152 268
20 58 213
15 0 0
10 0 0
TOTAL 210 501
MULTS 63 94
CLAIMED SCORE: 144,597
COUNTIES: 49
STATES: 48 (NO AK, DE)
PROVINCES: 8 (INCL PEI)
DX: POLAND, NETHERLANDS, COSTA RICA, ITALY, AUSTRALIA, MEXICO, EAST KIRIBATI, GALAPAGOS ISLANDS, ECUADOR
PREVIOUS YEAR SCORES:
Our scores through the years: (final corrected scores except 2025)
Year W8SH W8UM
2025 144,597 (M/M CLAIMED) TBA
2024 122,612 (M/S) 134,400 (M/M)
2023 77,364 (M/S) 16,236 (SO LP)
2022 75,088 (SO LP) No entry
2021 675 (M/S) 13,600 (SO LP)
2020 No entry No entry
2019 41,800 (M/S) 79,365 (M/M)
2018 124,465 (M/M) 96,390 (M/M)
2017 93,168 (M/M) 31,408 (M/M)
2016 75,312 (M/M) No entry
2015 57,404 (M/M) 116,739 (M/M)
2014 104,536 (M/M 1st) No entry
2013 99,830 (M/M) No entry
2012 52,364 (M/M) No entry
2011 39,289 (M/S) No entry
2010 No entry No entry
2009 6,815 (M/S) No entry
2008 37,469 (M/S) No entry
April 21st, 2024
Frank Maynard, NF8M
nf8m@arrl.net
RE: MI QSO Party
All in all, we had a very successful day considering that we have three marginal antennas, a very high noise level and only one functional operating position which had to be shared with CW and SSB. If anything put us behind, other than QSOs lost in the noise, it was the time we took to allow the students that Norah invited into the shack to get on the air and make a few contacts. Even though our rate dropped substantially during that time, I feel that the investment made in introducing new people to ham radio was worthwhile. I served as control operator for almost the full 12 hours (Charlie KE8ZRH was able to control-op for his shift and a couple of the students) and I assisted the eight or so unlicensed students, showing and telling how to make a QSO, what to say, and doing the logging for them. They each made anywhere from three to a dozen contacts. Each one seemed quite interested in ham radio and was excited to make HF contacts, and one stuck around for a couple hours watching and listening.
We got off to a great start. I ran CW for about an hour on 20 and 40 meters, and Norah took over and ran SSB for a bit until the students had their time. Norah and I alternated after that, each doing about an hour for the rest of the day and evening. Also of note was that the writers and photographer from Spartan Magazine (the alumni and donor publication) came and interviewed Norah and Dr. Hipple (KE8UQV) and took lots of pictures and video for a feature in an upcoming issue.
Looking at the breakdowns, the small differences in the balance between SSB and CW QSOs (where CW are worth 2 points and SSB 1 point) and their larger total of 20 meter CW QSOs when the band was open in the afternoon made the difference - but more importantly, Norah gained valuable experience and skill at running pileups, which she handled very well considering her almost total lack of experience ("I did this once", she said).
A bright side is that we are still #1 in Multiop/Single Transmitter, at least as far as claimed scores go on 3830.
We are somewhat disadvantaged geographically in that we are near the center of the lower peninsula and thus many close-in county mults are in the skip zone. (See the county breakdown below.) That doesn't matter as much on 80 at night but W8UM, being closer to the southern border, could potentially work more mid-state county mults. Perhaps our low-to-the-roof dipoles help with a NVIS pattern as well.
Many issues remain to be resolved, but once they are taken care of, we will have a good M/M operation for next year.
W8SH breakdown:
Band CW Qs Ph Qs
80: 64 16
40: 208 201
20: 25
15: 4
10:
Total: 297 221 CW Mults 75 Ph Mults 77 Total Score 123,880
W8UM breakdown:
Band CW Qs Ph Qs
80: 3 23
40: 217 183
20: 97 54
15:
10:
Total: 317 206 CW Mults 71 Ph Mults 79 Total Score 134,400
Counties we worked: (c=cw, p=phone) ALLE (p) AREN (p) BARA (cp) BENZ (c) BERR (cp) CASS (p) CHAR (p) CHIP (c) CLAR (p) CLIN (c) CRAW (p) DICK (cp) EATO (p) EMME (c) GENE (cp) GLAD (cp) GRAT (c) GRTR (c) HILL (p) HOUG (cp) INGH (cp) IONI (p) IRON (p) MECO (cp) MIDL (cp) MISS (c) MONR (cp) MTMO (cp) MUSK (cp) OAKL (cp) ONTO (p) OTSE (c) OTTA (cp) SAGI (cp) STCL (cp) TUSC (p) VANB (p) WASH (cp) WAYN (cp) WEXF (cp)
Counties left behind: ALCO ALGE ALPE ANTR BAY BRAN CALH CHEB DELT GOGE IOSC KEWE LAKE LEEL MACK MANI MASO MENO NEWA OCEA OGEM OSCE OSCO PRES ROSC SANI SCHO SHIA STJO
States worked: 0: CO (c) IA (cp) KS (cp) MN (cp) MO (c) NE (cp) 1: CT (c) MA (cp) ME (p) VT (cp) 2: NJ (cp) NY (cp) 3: DE (cp) MD (cp) PA (cp) 4: AL (p) FL (cp) GA (cp) KY (cp) NC (cp) SC (cp) VA (cp) 5: AR (cp) LA (cp) OK (cp) TX (cp) 6: CA (c) 7: AZ (p) MT (c) NV (p) OR (c) WA (c) 8: MI (cp) OH (cp) WV (c) 9: IL (cp) IN (cp) WI (cp) VE: ON (cp) QC (c) SK (c) DX: OM (c)
Our scores through the years: (final corrected scores except 2024)
Year W8SH W8UM
2024 (claimed) 123,880 (M/S) 134,400 (M/M)
2023 77,364 (M/S) 16,236 (SO LP)
2022 75,088 (SO LP) No entry
2021 675 (M/S) 13,600 (SO LP)
2020 No entry No entry
2019 41,800 (M/S) 79,365 (M/M)
2018 124,465 (M/M) 96,390 (M/M)
2017 93,168 (M/M) 31,408 (M/M)
2016 75,312 (M/M) No entry
2015 57,404 (M/M) 116,739 (M/M)
2014 104,536 (M/M 1st) No entry
2013 99,830 (M/M) No entry
2012 52,364 (M/M) No entry
2011 39,289 (M/S) No entry
2010 No entry No entry
2009 6,815 (M/S) No entry
2008 37.469 (M/S) No entry
Note that 2020 was the year of the Covid shutdown, and in 2021 only authorized persons (students) were allowed into the building, so we really had no good way to prep the station or operate. KW4EV worked what he could in the time he had available that year.
I've updated our 3830 posting with the following soapbox, editing the first paragraph of this email slightly and adding a bit.
All in all, we had a very successful day and our second-highest score ever considering that we have three marginal antennas, a very high noise level and only one operating position which had to be shared with CW and SSB. If anything put us behind, other than QSOs lost in the noise, it was the time we took to allow the several students that our new club president (who has yet to take her license test) invited into the shack to get on the air and make a few contacts. Even though our rate dropped substantially during that time, I feel that the investment made in introducing new people to ham radio was worthwhile. I served as control operator for almost the full 12 hours, and assisted the eight or so unlicensed students, showing and telling how to make a QSO, what to say, and doing the logging for them. They each made anywhere from three to a dozen contacts. Each one seemed quite interested in ham radio and was excited to make HF contacts, and one stuck around for a couple hours watching and listening. We were fortunate to not only maintain a high rate during the time that we ran, but that we are inspiring and enabling a future generation of hams. Our hands-tied-behind-the-back approach caused us to lose our annual competition with a rival university by a few thousand points, but it is all in the name of growing our fabulous hobby. Spartans WILL. (NF8M)
--
73,
Frank Maynard, NF8M
nf8m@arrl.net